Which Of The Following Is True About The Legality Of An Agreement

Answer the following questions, then click “Submit” to get your score. The fourth required element of a valid contract is legality. The basic rule is that the courts will not enforce an illegal business. Contracts are only enforceable if they are concluded with the intention that they are legal and that the parties intend to be legally bound by their agreement. An agreement between family members to go to dinner with a member who covers the check is legal, but it is unlikely to be made with the intention of being a legally binding agreement. Just as a contract to buy illicit drugs is entered into by a drug trafficker with all parties who know that what they are doing is against the law and therefore not a contract that is enforceable in court. An agreement between private parties that creates mutual obligations that are legally enforceable. The basic elements necessary for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are: mutual consent, expressed through a valid offer and acceptance; appropriate review; capacity; and legality. In some States, the consideration element may be filled in with a valid replacement. Possible remedies in the event of a breach of contract are general damages, indirect damages, damages of trust and certain services. Sally concludes with her employer that at the end of the year she will have a salary of £35,000 per year plus a cash payment of £20,000 that will not be declared, thus avoiding taxes. Sally`s employer has now refused to pay her the £20,000.

Can Sally take legal action to enforce the £20,000 payment? If the Contract does not comply with the legal requirements to be considered a valid contract, the “Contract Contract” will not be enforced by law, and the infringing party will not be required to compensate the non-infringing party. That is, the plaintiff (non-infringing party) in a contractual dispute that sues the infringing party can only receive damage to the expectation if he can prove that the alleged contractual agreement actually existed and was a valid and enforceable contract. In this case, the damage caused to the expectation that attempts to turn the non-infringing party into a whole will be rewarded by allocating the amount of money that the party would have paid had there been no breach of contract, plus any reasonably foreseeable consequential damages incurred as a result of the breach. . . .